Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 05:54

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ozempic has ‘very rare’ sight loss side effect, EU drugs regulator finds - politico.eu
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sarepta reports second patient death after treatment with Duchenne gene therapy - statnews.com
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Walking This Many Steps Per Day Can Cut Your Risk Of Early Death - HuffPost
Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Why Stocks Are up and Oil Is Down As the US and Iran Trade Strikes - Business Insider
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What are the bitter truths of life one should know?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
NASA robot for drilling on icy moons tested on Alaskan glacier - Ars Technica
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Citigroup lifts banking curbs on gun makers and sellers - NBC News